Cart

Your Cart is Empty

Back To Shop
Sale!

Alibaba IPO Dilemma – Hong Kong or New York Case Study Solution

$15.00

“Alibaba IPO Dilemma – Hong Kong or New York Case Study Solution ”  comprises 229  words, excel sheet and include the following –

  • Strategic Choice Analysis
  • NPV Analysis
  • Fresh Cash Flow Growth Rate
  • Discount Rate
  • Terminal Rate

In April 2014, Alibaba’s impending initial public offering (IPO) projected to be among the world’s largest IPOs. Alibaba faced many choices regarding ownership structure, trading location, IPO pricing and IPO timing. The Hong Kong Stock Exchange seemed like a natural fit for its IPO due to geographical, cultural and language proximity. Furthermore, 86.7 per cent of Alibaba’s revenues originated within China. However, Alibaba insisted on “partnership governance,” and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange did not allow listing of companies with dual-class share structure. In contrast, the New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ did not object to Alibaba’s proposed ownership structure. While the Hong Kong investors knew Alibaba’s business better, the New York exchanges provided more liquidity and visibility. Against this backdrop, Alibaba needed to make difficult decisions regarding its IPO

Case Authors : Emir Hrnjic

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Sale!

“Alibaba IPO Dilemma – Hong Kong or New York Case Study Solution ”  comprises 229  words, excel sheet and include the following –

  • Strategic Choice Analysis
  • NPV Analysis
  • Fresh Cash Flow Growth Rate
  • Discount Rate
  • Terminal Rate

In April 2014, Alibaba’s impending initial public offering (IPO) projected to be among the world’s largest IPOs. Alibaba faced many choices regarding ownership structure, trading location, IPO pricing and IPO timing. The Hong Kong Stock Exchange seemed like a natural fit for its IPO due to geographical, cultural and language proximity. Furthermore, 86.7 per cent of Alibaba’s revenues originated within China. However, Alibaba insisted on “partnership governance,” and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange did not allow listing of companies with dual-class share structure. In contrast, the New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ did not object to Alibaba’s proposed ownership structure. While the Hong Kong investors knew Alibaba’s business better, the New York exchanges provided more liquidity and visibility. Against this backdrop, Alibaba needed to make difficult decisions regarding its IPO

Case Authors : Emir Hrnjic

Topic : Finance & Accounting

 

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

Cart

Your Cart is Empty

Back To Shop