SWOT 201
$5.00
SWOT 201
SWOT 201
Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Related products
-
American Automobiles Limited Production Planning Case Study Solution
$10.00Add to cart“American Automobiles Limited Production Planning Case Study Solution ” comprises two files – 610 words and an excel sheet. Complete Solution include the following –
- Overview
- Problem Statement
- Model Explanation
- Result and Discussions
- Recommendations
Case Authors : Ajith J. Kumar, Soumitra Chakraborty, Ankit Dhaka
-
National Football League and Brain Injuries
$10.00Add to cartCase Authors – Richard G. Hamermesh, Matthew Preble
Words – 1643 Words
The case study solution of “National Football League and Brain Injuries ” has 1643 words, it comprises the following analysis –
- Problem Statement
- Stakeholders Analysis
- Ethical Analysis
- Legal Analysis
- NFL Response
- Recommendations
-
3M Strategic Management Analysis
$10.00Add to cart3M Strategic Management Analysis is a 1739 words document and it includes the following –
- Introduction to 3M
- Products and Services
- Business Verticals
- Porter Five Forces Analysis
- Competition among existing players
- Bargaining power of buyers
- Bargaining power of suppliers
- Threat of new entrants
- Threats of Substitutions
- SWOT Analysis
- Strengths of 3M
- Weaknesses of 3M
- Opportunities for 3M
- Threats 3M is facing
- Triple Bottom Line Analysis of 3M
- Financial Analysis
- Environmental Analysis
- Social Analysis
-
Alibaba IPO Dilemma – Hong Kong or New York Case Study Solution
$15.00Add to cart“Alibaba IPO Dilemma – Hong Kong or New York Case Study Solution ” comprises 229 words, excel sheet and include the following –
- Strategic Choice Analysis
- NPV Analysis
- Fresh Cash Flow Growth Rate
- Discount Rate
- Terminal Rate
In April 2014, Alibaba’s impending initial public offering (IPO) projected to be among the world’s largest IPOs. Alibaba faced many choices regarding ownership structure, trading location, IPO pricing and IPO timing. The Hong Kong Stock Exchange seemed like a natural fit for its IPO due to geographical, cultural and language proximity. Furthermore, 86.7 per cent of Alibaba’s revenues originated within China. However, Alibaba insisted on “partnership governance,” and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange did not allow listing of companies with dual-class share structure. In contrast, the New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ did not object to Alibaba’s proposed ownership structure. While the Hong Kong investors knew Alibaba’s business better, the New York exchanges provided more liquidity and visibility. Against this backdrop, Alibaba needed to make difficult decisions regarding its IPO
Case Authors : Emir Hrnjic
Topic : Finance & Accounting
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.