SWOT 201
$10.00 $5.00
SWOT 201
SWOT 201
Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Related products
-
3M Strategic Management Analysis
$20.00$10.00Add to cart3M Strategic Management Analysis is a 1739 words document and it includes the following –
- Introduction to 3M
- Products and Services
- Business Verticals
- Porter Five Forces Analysis
- Competition among existing players
- Bargaining power of buyers
- Bargaining power of suppliers
- Threat of new entrants
- Threats of Substitutions
- SWOT Analysis
- Strengths of 3M
- Weaknesses of 3M
- Opportunities for 3M
- Threats 3M is facing
- Triple Bottom Line Analysis of 3M
- Financial Analysis
- Environmental Analysis
- Social Analysis
-
Able Translations – International Strategy at the Crossroads
$20.00$10.00Add to cartThe “Able Translations – International Strategy at the Crossroads” case study solution comprises 1066 words and includes the following –
Overview
Problem Statement
Industry Analysis & Porter Five Analysis
SWOT Analysis of Able Translations
Alternatives – Three Alternatives are Presented
Recommendations
Action Plan
-
AGV Crisis at the Top Case Study Solution
$20.00$10.00Add to cart“AGV Crisis at the Top” case study solution comprises 1109 words and include the following –
- Determinants of health for people of Odisha
- Evaluate Mission and Vision
- Four actions that Chandra can take to improve the situation
- Organization Culture of AGV
- 11 Points of failing organization culture at AGV
-
Alibaba IPO Dilemma – Hong Kong or New York Case Study Solution
$20.00$15.00Add to cart“Alibaba IPO Dilemma – Hong Kong or New York Case Study Solution ”  comprises 229 words, excel sheet and include the following –
- Strategic Choice Analysis
- NPV Analysis
- Fresh Cash Flow Growth Rate
- Discount Rate
- Terminal Rate
In April 2014, Alibaba’s impending initial public offering (IPO) projected to be among the world’s largest IPOs. Alibaba faced many choices regarding ownership structure, trading location, IPO pricing and IPO timing. The Hong Kong Stock Exchange seemed like a natural fit for its IPO due to geographical, cultural and language proximity. Furthermore, 86.7 per cent of Alibaba’s revenues originated within China. However, Alibaba insisted on “partnership governance,” and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange did not allow listing of companies with dual-class share structure. In contrast, the New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ did not object to Alibaba’s proposed ownership structure. While the Hong Kong investors knew Alibaba’s business better, the New York exchanges provided more liquidity and visibility. Against this backdrop, Alibaba needed to make difficult decisions regarding its IPO
Case Authors : Emir Hrnjic
Topic : Finance & Accounting
ToroRise
Learning by doing
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.